Covid Vaccines, Embryogenesis, and LINE-1 Retrotransposons

Insights from PhDs, Anonymous Whistleblower Engineers, and an Ordinary Lab Tech

Over at Unacceptable Jessica, Dr. Jessica Rose lets us know about a couple of papers that indicate potential problems posed by the covid vaccines for embryogenesis. It’s short, so read the whole thing.

All of this is in the context that we already know the covid vaccines are screwing up embryogenesis. We know from Israeli and US data, as well as reports from doctors on the ground in Canada and elsewhere. Dr. Rose has written multiple articles on that. Rather than linking to them all here, you can go to her newsletter, linked above, and search for the term “miscarriage.”

I left the following comment on her article:

~~~~~~~~~~~

No surprises there, on multiple levels. There was an anonymous putative whistleblower from Moderna who warned about this.

My experience first, then the anon.

20 years ago I was a lowly lab technician working on a DARPA project to engineer Arabidopsis plants to sense anthrax. Roughly 70%-80% of the F1s died, of course. (They would be equivalent to the miscarried babies of mRNA injected mothers.)

The F2s and F3s were interesting (for readers, this would be equivalent to the grandchildren and great-grandchildren of injected mothers). A greater portion survived, often with strange physical deformities, but they had silenced the transgene.

I prefer to take a long view in these apocalyptic times. Life does find a way and there will be a remnant. But it sure is disturbing to live through it in the meantime.

Second, I did some preliminary lit research for Mathew back in October about how covid vax might affect fertility. He didn’t have the bandwidth for it at the time but I learned later that his wife works on retrotransposons, so she would have been able to check out the legitimacy of the last tidbit I’ll share here.  (It’s a little above my pay grade. I’m a mycologist and microbiologist of sorts, not much experience with human systems. I was mainly hoping Mathew might know IT people who would be able to track the whistleblower down.)

Third, a broad view suggests there may be multiple ways in which covid-19 vaccines contribute to infertility in both women and men. There are the four of which I have previously been aware: 

• -reduction in estrogen in F2 generation and beyond

• -antibodies to syncitin triggered because spike has homology to it

• -reproductively toxic LNP delivery systems

• -SM-102

This is not an exhaustive list.

Finally, for the big whammy that ties into the Truman crap they're likely attempting (Transhuman 2.0).

In Sept 2020, the following was produced somewhere on the internet and shared in a covid vax skeptic group. I have it screen-capped but there’s no way to share that screen-cap here (note — this was in Jessica’s comment thread where one cannot share graphics, but I have placed the screencap below my transcript here).

I have transcribed it, because I think it’s that important now.

Before it was hearsay, but now it’s concordant with the accumulation of data and particularly the recent news about LINE-1 upregulation.

Without further ado, here is the anonymous whistleblower’s statement:

“I’m an industrial engineer at Moderna and the other one of us is a process development engineer. I’m sure the same thing is happening with Pfizer-BioNTech. It was hard to pull things together based on the small quantities of additions happening in manual step (highly unorthodox for a continuous process production). The explanation we got was highly sensitive trade secret adjuvants being added. Digging in deeper showed how sensitive it actually was.

Most people’s understanding of this novel vaccine type is that it works as follows:

1) Make mRNA coding for S protein

2) Make lipid nanoparticle delivery system

3) Profit

How it actually works from what we’ve discovered:

1) Make mRNA coding for S protein

2) Make mRNA coding for mutant versions of CYP19A1 and CDKN1B in smaller amounts

3) Make sure that while delivery system for (1) mostly ends up in liver, most of (2) ends up in the gonads

4) Make sure form and quantity of additive upregulating LINE-1 reverse transcription activity makes it hard to detect among legal adjuvants

5) Effects from (2) integrated by (4) are recessive; mildly oncogenic effects in vaccine recipients unlikely to be noticed for many years

6) (5) recessive but since most of population is vaccinated, in next generation female offspring have premature ovarian failure.

(6) coincides with poor people being obsoleted by AI and Robotics, so we didn’t have to dig for motivation.

We’ve taken precautions but fear for our safety. So far I don’t think we’ve raised suspicion but can’t be sure. Not sure what to do. Avoiding taking the vaccine makes up prime suspects for this leak.”