Dr. John Campbell, a PhD nurse trainer, has been a trusted source of information for many people in the covid pandemic. I’ve always thought Dr. Campbell was an honest player. I have to credit him for doing excellent work in highlighting the usefulness of ivermectin, but it’s been frustrating watching him continue to trundle out the narrative on covid vaccines for an entire year, and at a certain point I “tuned out” due to this.
I can only conclude that it's hard for people in the medical profession to face this level of negligence and corruption on the part of the regulatory system, or the harm that's been done by themselves in their advocacy, or their own colleagues in their practice.
As many of you already know, the FDA and Pfizer sought to hide internal documents regarding post-EUA data collection about Pfizer’s covid vaccine for 55-75 years, after which the scientists, regulators, Pfizer executives, and most of the people who had taken the vaccines would conveniently be long dead.
The FDA and Pfizer lost this court battle and were forced to release the documents within 8 months. The first set has now been released. Dr. John Campbell summarizes them.
Campbell still has an audience of 2.27 million since he has not been de-platformed, so I suppose there is one benefit to waiting this long to call into question the safety of this product, since the media refuses to cover this story and social media censors it.
I never trusted covid vaccines for two primary reasons.
#1: Even prior to the covid pandemic, we’ve known that cheap and effective treatments have been suppressed, particularly in the cancer industry. This really should be common knowledge since it’s been going on for 50-100 years, but it isn’t. It’s labeled as “quackery” and “conspiracy theory.”
Here is a highly referenced piece I wrote (27 references, all but a few peer-reviewed) that makes the case in a very short space for Vitamin C as a safe and effective cancer treatment. For his efforts to study and publish results of intravenous Vitamin C as a cancer treatment, Linus Pauling, Nobel Prize winner, was labeled as a quack.
That was 43 years ago. It’s been downhill ever since. You know what they say about having to reach rock bottom before anything changes. Hopefully we are finally there.
#2: mRNA injections are a new technology that is too underdeveloped for mild disease, with a dangerous mechanisms from an evolutionary standpoint, as I pointed out here:
All of this should have been obvious to many people who really should have known better than to trust this process and these products implicitly. But people were singularly focused on these vaccines as a silver bullet due to a combination of naiveté, desperation, and government/legacy media brainwashing. I too hoped they would work, but there were already alarming signals by January 2021.
I have my days where it's been difficult to tolerate the surprise of many academics and health practitioners, but welcoming them to the fold is the only hope of getting a Kuhnian paradigm shift in medicine.
Here are some of the comments I screen-capped on Dr. Campbell’s video, particularly if it goes down the memory hole soon. They speak for themselves.
I share your sentiment. I watched many of his early videos, wondering if he saw what I saw. My conclusions often diverged from his, but something that kept me watching was that he seemed to be honest in his inquiry. It’s important at this juncture, however, to remember to hold a good measure of compassion for others. We need *all* allies, not just those that saw truly from the outset. We all have our blind spots. Everyone sees through a different lens, and sometimes that lens can be clouded by assumptions, prejudice, or past learning. It’s also ok if you don’t feel the need to give Campbell props—that’s something we each decide to give on our own. But in my book, I think he deserves it…not because he passed some paladin test of flawless sight, but because he is open hearted enough to continue to try to publicly make sense out of a landscape which is more akin to a minefield—that takes both bravery and integrity, and for me, deserves respect.
I totally agree, Monica. It has been frustrating to see Dr John (and others) taking a mid-line approach in the face of considerable evidence, although I have noticed at times John will reveal what he really thinks about certain things using thinly veiled sarcasm, which I appreciate. I've kept John on my podcast 'radar', but have also tuned out at times due to some of the COVID-19 vaccine content. I'm glad to see someone with a substantially large following stepping out in a more forceful manner, in light of the recently-released Pfizer/FDA docs. I agree with many of those commenting both here and within your post on John's video, that this is something many of us have been trying (in the face of relentless public vilification and in some cases, job losses) to flag for months (and some over a year). I recently surrendered my professional nursing registration (in Australia) as I cannot believe our health regulators, and many grassroots health practitioners, are continuing in their complicity by enabling the egregious 'public health' policies which have broadly recommended these COVID-19 vaccines for virtually all people (regardless of risk and risk reduction), and in some instances upheld mandates. I refuse to be 'regulated' by agencies which have displayed a complete lack of moral fortitude and a total disregard for the most fundamental principles of medical ethics. I hope some of the concerns which have previously been disingenuously dismissed as 'conspiracy theory' are starting to be more thoughtfully considered in the good faith with which they were always intended.