What people believe, even in our circles, is a spectrum. I try to be generous and grant that people are still navigating their way through the dystopia. You and I are on the less normie end of the spectrum.
For instance, you won't see bad cattitude discuss this topic of potential sterility. Probably because he's friends with Battacharya.
Normies. Lol
Part of it is that these people still want their safe, comfortable lives. That's why they use pseudonyms. You need to be insanely rich like Musk or Yeadon to say what you actually think. Or otherwise independent from the system or sufficiently old and retired, like Malone.
Or you already lost everything and no longer have ANY fucks to give -- people like me.
People with extremely broad reach sense that they can't touch these topics seriously without massive reach loss. Even Musk just jokes about a lot of the stuff.
The big blogs have certain themes on repeat and, as you have noted, it's a spectrum.
Kulldorff and Battacharya: lockdowns and censorship BAD. Covid vaccines for those who want them GOOD.
Eugyppius: masks, lockdowns, and vaccines BAD. No conspiracy.
Greenwald and Taibbi: censorship and left-hypocrisy: BAD. (The good is never mentioned.)
Alex Berenson: covid vaccines, censorship, and weed BAD. OK, inflation bad too. But the Fed could probably fix it. Everything else about America, including idiotic wars that will bankrupt the country, J6 hearings, and so on... GOOD!
Mentally ill vegans running for local government office in New Zealand: Covid vaccines, germ theory, meat, and bitcoin BAD. Climate and Peak Oil hysteria, bicycles, and Peak Eco Totalitarianism GOOD.
On a bright note, I think the comment ban feature for non-subs is working again, but motivated Caulibrain types will undoubtedly just continue to make new email accounts. ::snickers::
But where on the spectrum do you place yourself with regard to the "Aschen Agenda" being not so much a worldwide population implosion controlled by globalist technocrats across the planet, but 1) an ethnofascist conspiracy engaging in asymmetric total warfare, collapsing an economy while ensuring only one specific tribal group remains intact on the planet; 2) an interplanetary conspiracy engaging in cultivation and genetic bottlenecking of a species that's clearly sent the planet's biosphere into near-universal extinction; 3) a transdimensional conspiracy harnessing the collective trauma of distributed intelligent lifeforms on the planet for its desirable energy; 4) an metaleptical conspiracy where the author had to conceive of a very stark Third Act for our protagonist to self-actualize into a hero?
Some really "out there" ideas are not brought up, that's true.
Also, sometimes a pseudonym fits a persona of one's self better than a "real name," especially when it's just the slices of who we were captured in that text.
If Elon wants to Red Pill, then go all the way, Richest Man.
Don't be coy. Let it out full force.
-----
Also, polling every board:
Is there one person in public office or running for public office in the United States that will say straight up:
"The experimental mRNA gene editing vaccines do not work and are very dangerous."
What people believe, even in our circles, is a spectrum. I try to be generous and grant that people are still navigating their way through the dystopia. You and I are on the less normie end of the spectrum.
For instance, you won't see bad cattitude discuss this topic of potential sterility. Probably because he's friends with Battacharya.
Normies. Lol
Part of it is that these people still want their safe, comfortable lives. That's why they use pseudonyms. You need to be insanely rich like Musk or Yeadon to say what you actually think. Or otherwise independent from the system or sufficiently old and retired, like Malone.
Or you already lost everything and no longer have ANY fucks to give -- people like me.
People with extremely broad reach sense that they can't touch these topics seriously without massive reach loss. Even Musk just jokes about a lot of the stuff.
The big blogs have certain themes on repeat and, as you have noted, it's a spectrum.
Kulldorff and Battacharya: lockdowns and censorship BAD. Covid vaccines for those who want them GOOD.
Eugyppius: masks, lockdowns, and vaccines BAD. No conspiracy.
Greenwald and Taibbi: censorship and left-hypocrisy: BAD. (The good is never mentioned.)
Alex Berenson: covid vaccines, censorship, and weed BAD. OK, inflation bad too. But the Fed could probably fix it. Everything else about America, including idiotic wars that will bankrupt the country, J6 hearings, and so on... GOOD!
Mentally ill vegans running for local government office in New Zealand: Covid vaccines, germ theory, meat, and bitcoin BAD. Climate and Peak Oil hysteria, bicycles, and Peak Eco Totalitarianism GOOD.
lol.
You get the idea, Sage.
You nailed it, Monica. I can believe that I can sum this up a bit.
The "bigger" they are, the closer they are to prominence, the more they bargain.
Big theme of mine.
And btw, Mentally Ill Vegan NZ dude is now creating new email accounts to troll after being banned by Substack HQ from my account.
Naturally. When you eat nothing but cauliflower, your brain turns into it.
You are what you eat?
heh.
Hahahahahaha.
On a bright note, I think the comment ban feature for non-subs is working again, but motivated Caulibrain types will undoubtedly just continue to make new email accounts. ::snickers::
Just emailed you.
But where on the spectrum do you place yourself with regard to the "Aschen Agenda" being not so much a worldwide population implosion controlled by globalist technocrats across the planet, but 1) an ethnofascist conspiracy engaging in asymmetric total warfare, collapsing an economy while ensuring only one specific tribal group remains intact on the planet; 2) an interplanetary conspiracy engaging in cultivation and genetic bottlenecking of a species that's clearly sent the planet's biosphere into near-universal extinction; 3) a transdimensional conspiracy harnessing the collective trauma of distributed intelligent lifeforms on the planet for its desirable energy; 4) an metaleptical conspiracy where the author had to conceive of a very stark Third Act for our protagonist to self-actualize into a hero?
Some really "out there" ideas are not brought up, that's true.
Also, sometimes a pseudonym fits a persona of one's self better than a "real name," especially when it's just the slices of who we were captured in that text.
"Some really "out there" ideas are not brought up"
Until Polemos arrives. ЁЯШ│ ЁЯШВ
Yes, Ron Johnson but only recently. Watch him on the high wire today
Okay I will.
And if I find the quote I will make a clip of the sound bite and post it.
Nope!