Sure. Naturally when one sees things that look like chips, one thinks chips.
One thing Musk doesn't talk about is that the Neuralink chips kill 50% of the animals.
I'm with Malone in that I think what the transhumanists discuss and desire to do is one thing. What they are capable of achieving at this point is another.
Sure. Naturally when one sees things that look like chips, one thinks chips.
One thing Musk doesn't talk about is that the Neuralink chips kill 50% of the animals.
I'm with Malone in that I think what the transhumanists discuss and desire to do is one thing. What they are capable of achieving at this point is another.
One simple possibility is that there are self-assembling carbon-based nanotubes in the vaccines that either:
1) accidentally assemble on a slide into something resembling a chip, but the graphene is really just for gene delivery
2) deliberately assemble into something resembling a chip, but it's a primitive form of technology they want to develop, and they are covertly experimenting on the human population at large
A number of people have floated the hypothesis and I believe it is plausible. I am not personally as concerned about the viability of this technology as it I am the type of mechanical damage that it can do within the body, and also potentially bio chemical damage.
My personal hypothesis is that there are many multiple intentions for the vaccines, and one of them may be to see how much graphene can be placed in before it becomes unavoidably toxic at a level that is noticed by the public.
They need to stay below that level for future “variant specific” vaccines that may covertly include "2.0" of this strange technology.
I think this is more a function of uncritical thinkers getting the jab. In Germany there was a stidy, what influenced people to get the jab: the biggest predictors were 1) having a close acquaintance who died of covid and 2) watching mainstream media
Sure. Naturally when one sees things that look like chips, one thinks chips.
One thing Musk doesn't talk about is that the Neuralink chips kill 50% of the animals.
I'm with Malone in that I think what the transhumanists discuss and desire to do is one thing. What they are capable of achieving at this point is another.
One simple possibility is that there are self-assembling carbon-based nanotubes in the vaccines that either:
1) accidentally assemble on a slide into something resembling a chip, but the graphene is really just for gene delivery
2) deliberately assemble into something resembling a chip, but it's a primitive form of technology they want to develop, and they are covertly experimenting on the human population at large
I think both hypotheses are plausible.
Do you know the substack of "A Midwestern Doctor"? He thinks they are at least covertly doing dose finding studies on the population
A number of people have floated the hypothesis and I believe it is plausible. I am not personally as concerned about the viability of this technology as it I am the type of mechanical damage that it can do within the body, and also potentially bio chemical damage.
My personal hypothesis is that there are many multiple intentions for the vaccines, and one of them may be to see how much graphene can be placed in before it becomes unavoidably toxic at a level that is noticed by the public.
They need to stay below that level for future “variant specific” vaccines that may covertly include "2.0" of this strange technology.
If true, we should start constructing gallows. Lots of them And not covertly.
Judging by the ammo being sold there is am ongoing reaction.
Well then you might like this poll:
https://dossier.substack.com/p/supporting-the-current-thing-covid?s=r
Zing a few commands through 5G and they all fall in line?
I think this is more a function of uncritical thinkers getting the jab. In Germany there was a stidy, what influenced people to get the jab: the biggest predictors were 1) having a close acquaintance who died of covid and 2) watching mainstream media
Ok. Interesting to consider.