32 Comments

There's a fourth possibility to explain the Shanghai lockdowns: it's cover for shutting down the port, which is being done to wage economic warfare against the US without admitting that's what they're doing.

But tbh I find the hypothesis that the CCP has gotten carried away with Zero Covid to be more plausible.

Expand full comment

The economic war theory is my front runner tbh. Worth considering that China plans 25 & 50 years ahead whereas in the west we are more conditioned to watch ministers reacting to events rather than planning anything. That reframing makes all the difference.

Expand full comment

I don't find economic warfare at all implausible per se. It just seems like a draconian 40-day lockdown of 25 million people is going unnecessarily far to keep the deception going. On the other hand, look at Chinese history: the Great Leap Forward, the Cultural Revolution, hell even the construction of the Great Wall or the destruction of the Treasure Fleet - all of these indicate a cultural propensity for full-scale mobilization behind often-dubious goals that can be pursued out of all proportion to their actual benefits (and with no mind paid to the costs).

Expand full comment

Perhaps it is all part of a "War Game Simulation" which is to research the real effects and model the needed changes for real Global Thermonuclear War?

The "One Clenched Fist" theory is much more than just theory.

International Communist Revolution at work.

Folks, the plan has not changed since around 1960.

Read “New Lies for Old” by Anatoliy Golitsyn.

http://www.doomedsoldiers.c…

“There seem to be three possible scenarios around which the history

of the next half century will be written:

In the first, communism, meeting neither ideological nor political resistance from the West, continues along its present course to disarmament, then to convergence with the West on its own terms, and so to world domination.

In the second, the West realizes in time the nature of the communist threat, solves its own national problems, unites the noncom-munist world, and adopts a policy of open competition between the two systems; as a result, the peoples of the communist bloc repudiate their leaders and the communist empire disintegrates.

The third scenario resembles the second except that both systems remain intact and competition continues for a very long time.

And who shall say that unrelenting competition between two opposing systems of government, each secured by the nuclear deter- rent, would not prove fruitful? But where are the statesmen who will recognize this path to possible safety and guide their peoples along it?”

Expand full comment

Scenario 4 is hidden forces control all major powers and as someone said, "Nothing that happens in politics was not planned that way" or something like that.

The danger to us regular folk is two fold, one: we do not know their plan, not really, we just think we do from what we see happening and two: we are nearly powerless to resist unless we come together, stop infighting and collaborate to solve the problem by taking bite sized chunks faster than the hidden forces can counter us.

Expand full comment

Some would say we are in the first, others would say the third with the rise of China and the Russian Nuclear Modernization.

There may be a fourth, where all the world's Intel Agencies are united behind even their own government's backs. Putin did arrest, imprison, and possibly even execute FSB (KGB) agents that worked with the CIA in the Russia Collusion Hoax.

However, Anatoiliy Golitsyn and James Jesus Angleton (chief of counterintelligence for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) from 1954 to 1974) were discredited by the CIA and they elected to not recognize any long range Soviet plan, possibly because they thought the could turn the Chinese with Kissinger's "Nixon goes to China" plan which should by now be obviously one of Communism's greatest victories if not the greatest Intel Op in world history.

Expand full comment

Interesting.

Well, it is certainly the case that 'intelligence services' are and have always, at least in part, answered to their corporate overlords rather than to Govt. As a matter of fact even before they officially existed as we know them today their origins were rooted in corporate interests. During WW1 the only US State Dept. intelligence officer in the middle east was one William Yale, an employee of Standard Oil, alumni of Yale Uni and ancestor of its founders. Everything you need to know right there, not much has changed with 'official' status.

I see 'intelligence services' as subversion and coercion operatives rather than decision makers. They do other peoples bidding.

Expand full comment

But they are above oversight.

As an example, the NSA is more concerned with their budget than any other issue and its activities support that assertion.

Expand full comment

All we can hope to so is cut off the heads of Medusa's snakes faster than they grow back. Not an easy task but just waiting we will all turn to stone.

Expand full comment

That's not likely. China is highly dependent on their exports and the revenue from those exports. They already have a bubble debt crisis and a declining GDP. That means fewer people improving their standard of living. Xi depends on a population more or less happy with his rule. I suspect they are caught in the trap of zero covid and think fear of covid will protect their actions. Remember the Chinese and most other places don't get the information from places like these SubStacks. Most Americans are clueless as well as they mask in their cars.

Expand full comment

I've heard another one, from a Chinese recently from China.

She claims it is a power play between the 'Shanghai Gang' and the Govt of Xi Jinping.

The 'shanghai gang' being, of course, ex leader Jiang Zemin and his adherents.

She claims that China is not at all as the West sees it: one monolithic structure, wholly CCP nicely structured and all in accord smoothly rising from the broad base to the powerful at the top.

Rather she sees it as a collection of fiefdoms, perhaps and fiefdoms with a large measure of autonomy.

No question of upstart 'power blocks' or such just asking to be chopped down to size as disturbing the even background of the nation.

No: more of this is 'background of the nation', this IS its structure. Begin to attack one and destroy its local power and you disturb and frighten all the others.

So they don't get attacked. It is the system. Everyone (except us) knows it. And it persists, condoned and accepted.

Like the lords of England behind the Magna Charta. Like, perhaps the oligarchs of Russia.

But there's some kind of issue between Xi Jinping and Jiang Zemin. I don't know what. But by doing this Jiang demonstrates his power.

Xi showed he had power to almost destroy USA and the west with a mere scare story.

Jiang demonstrates he can almost destroy USA and the west quite directly by shutting down 30 million people and world trade (large part of).

Interesting.

More and more we peasants learn the world is not as we thought.

Power blocks are in fact what it often is about, we see that now.

And somehow the truth is always kept from us. Miraculously. Incredibly. Considering the thousands ( millions ? ) of press people around the world and modern communications and instant access to data - somehow all those eyes and voices are shutdown and we hear nothing.

Did you, does the world, hear of the donbas shale gas factor in the Ukraine war? Nope All we ever hear is 'Russians bad monsters, kill Russians'.

That's how it is.

Power blocks. Manipulation. Censorship. Ignorance.

p.s. Later edit: I told my friend of this post. She says I am not correct. The majority of China, she says IS 'monolithic'. With some exceptions perhaps it is mainly just Shanghai with Jiang Zemin against Xi Jinping are the 'players' in this.

I stand corrected. However I do remember my four years in China and everywhere I went there were almost fortified large compounds containing perhaps factories, perhaps schools, universities, mines, whatever - and all, I was told, belonging to local rich and powerful men who did essentially as they wished.

In the intervening years since then I've understood Xi Jinping as being engaged in 'levelling' these 'local lords' with mixed measures of success.

So right now I'm inclined to think maybe it's true and maybe it's not and maybe it's half true. That China is 'fiefdoms'. And that the Shanghai lockdown is all attributable to the will of Jiang Zemin I'm inclined to think is true.

Very happy to get knowledgeable input to the question.

Expand full comment

Growing food is actually not that much work after the set up. With intelligent design, like counting steps and locating the most intensive activities close to the kitchen door, and this current arrangement becomes insane to carry on as we are. Some people have to drive to the grocery store when they could pick in a tenth of the time it takes to travel..

Expand full comment

You are the carbon that they want to reduce.

Expand full comment

100%

Expand full comment

Your not touching my lawn...

Expand full comment

I consider (1) epistemically impossible. China cannot "know" a biological reality that hasn't been demonstrated in the real world, as opposed to lab. They can only think they know something that has yet to be demonstrated IRL. I can think up a humanity-ending bioweapon (chickenpox with the dormancy timer genes removed is my go-to example) all I want, does that mean I know what will happen if it is released? Obviously, no. And if I release it and two years later not many have died, well, it was probably a dud.

Expand full comment

Keep something in mind, though, Brian. Highly educated people believe insane things about Covid, such as that young male teens that get infected may suffer from permanent erectile dysfunction, that 25% of infected people will get long Covid, etc.

These myths are quite prevalent in our society, so even if they are false beliefs, I don’t see any reason why the Chinese can be taken in by them also. But then, this would fall more under my third hypothesis.

Expand full comment

Right, whereas 1 is meant to be in context of our own current understanding / fear, not just "also being over-afraid like us." And if 2 is true, then some number of the people advocating for 1 (as well as a lot of the core research they cite, like the HIV insert papers), could be ops. But I don't think 2 is true either (and the call seems to be "coming from inside the house" as far as psy-ops to drum up a belief in 1).

Expand full comment

couldn’t

Expand full comment

Yes, it is more like the latter hypothesis I would lean toward. something based on inside knowledge of the engineering that has been attempted to be covered up by both the Chinese and the Americans.

Expand full comment

I got 12 trees in my back yard. 10 grew on their own...2 came with house. I'm a cheap bastard.

I surveyed them and 12 of 12 said: MORE CARBON.

And, they all said We ain't taking DEATHVAX, or wearing a freaken mask....

Expand full comment

I love that 'karentopia'. I hope it sticks. I don't like that last line:

"All bets are off this winter, though, with their heavily vaccinated and highly boosted populations."

It's not 100% clear but I feel it suggests that Australia's population may not have high levels of covid this winter because they are 'heavily vaccinated and highly boosted' ?

Because if so I think it is a wrong thing to say. My understanding of the whole thing is that vaccinations do NOT avoid covid or even markedly reduce symptoms or ICU stays - that Pfizer, for instance, only ever offered a 0.1% enhancement of existing immune system performance.

and that boosters somehow actually bring about further reductions of immune efficacy.

But to me it's not clear which the sentence actually says. But if that, then that. :)

Expand full comment

I mean things could get worse, because of winter and also the shots are causing innate immune suppression. If they do provide any protection it is fleeting.

Expand full comment

Thanks for the clarification, Monica. I am banging on these days about getting the language right. I like to say shots NEVER 'provide protection'.

If I punch a wooden plank does that protect my hand?

No way. It injures it.

So why do karate (is it?) people punch wooden planks?

Because in RESPONSE TO THE INJURY the hand develops calluses (a deformation and injury in itself) and is better able to withstand that injury in the future.

That's the analogous mechanism, isn't it?

It's not: 'vaccine provides protection'

It's 'Vaccine injury makes your immune system (hopefully) (marginally) better at the price of unknown consequences.

Isn't it?

And in the case of Pfizer according to their own report the 'marginally better' was of the order of 0.1%.

In this context I would like to know the estimated or perhaps actually measured (though I'm damned if i know how they could do it ) normal daily variation in immune system efficacy.

Daily. Weekly. Seasonally.

For wouldn't that be something if the normal variation in any time period were greater than 0.1% ?

And then a measure of the variation when necessary mineral and vitamins etc. are below optimum levels. What variation with melatonin down say, 5%?

And for the psychologists what variation when the spirits are low and depression, say, sets in?

And what variation commensurate on various illnesses?

And even more dramatic - what variation commensurate on various MEDICINES ? For I've read over the past two years that antibiotics themselves reduce the efficacy of the immune system! Antibiotics ! Astounding contention to a layman like me. Until I realise antibiotics just get in there and kill everything, anything within their sphere of action - 'good' and 'bad' alike.

What when all these factors are acting in concert? What variation then?

There should be three prominent actors on the stage in this theatre production:

a viral threat, the immune system and vaccines.

The narrative of Big Pharma and Dumb Govt. has managed to reduce the actors to two.

They have removed the immune System entirely.

And 'our side' goes along with it tacitly, even overtly. Every time we sit down and in all seriousness debate the level of supposed efficacy of a vaccine we're quite overtly concurring with the contention that vaccines do have some 'efficacy'.

And that's not fair and not right. They have none.

Not there. Not in that realm.

They DO have an 'efficacy' but it must be measured in terms of their operation and that operation is to ATTACK and provoke a response.

So you could say such and such a vaccine is even 150% efficacious if its target were, say, to produce x quantity of spike protein swamping the body and in fact it produced 1.5x.

That's as far a vaccine 'efficacy' goes.

Expand full comment

These injections do multiple things. I’m not going to go into detail here as is this is the focus of others who are doing the work (Bridle, Malone, Bossche, Rose, etc.). Some of them have slight side agreements and I’m not sure who is right. I also differ with some of these people on what I think the utiity of mRNA tech is.

My suspicion based on the numbers we have seen from many countries is that there is a potential for the current crop of poison vaccines to protect from covid for a brief window after the 2 week initial window when a person is jabbed. Kind of like how chemotherapy "works", if it doesn't kill you.

There’s a little too much surety and dogma in the anti-vax community for me. Reminds me of the pro vaxxers and charismatic religious people I was raised by. Dogma is not a path to truth.

I am never going to make people happy with the language I use because the community is too fractured. Some will go off for saying there is a virus. Others for saying vaccines are useful in some instances. Etc. and so on.

Everyone has their own beliefs.

My focus on this Substack is just to make sure that I am pointing out things that nobody else is paying attention to... such as that there is the potential for larger, sharp objects to form after injection, and this poses a unique challenge to our physiology. To my knowledge, there are few people pointing to this.

Another focus of mine is to show that medical tyranny has been going on a long time in the US and in regions where US pharmaceutical companies operate overseas. The US military has also been poisoning people for decades: my mother for sure and possibly my husband are victims. (I can't seem to find enough time to write these stories, but they help us to understand how we arrived at the current point.)

I'm fairly principled and ideological. I'm a libertarian in a loose sense, so I don't care if people want to poison themselves. If they do that, it helps the rest of us learn, and life can't be any other way. I'm a "the guardrails should be taken off the roads" type person. The guardrails (the FDA, TGA, Medsafe) are what got us here. People really need to understand this in life: they are on their own. Playing with Big Pharma products is like buying a used car from a shady dealer.

I just want greater awareness of that, the powers that be probably now controlling pharma, and I want the coercion and force to stop.

Expand full comment

Hi.... yep, that's all fine. I hope i didn't give you the impression I was aiming at your personal expression or 'english' or whatever.

I was not. Am not. Do not. Will not.

I am simply trying to say there's an enormous fundamental misapprehension on the part of the masses and we carelessly often condone and even promote that misapprehension.

Vaccines do not offer protection. Simple as that. And the phrase should not be allowed to pass, I believe.

Vaccines provoke your immune system in the hopes of improving its response is the truth and perhaps sometimes this works and for sure sometimes it does not and it always comes at some price. Is a further truth.

But that's 'further detail'. Need not be got into.

The fundamental is: Vaccines do NOT 'provide protection'. The Immune System does.

And specific anti-virals when the govt is not prohibiting their use.

Vaccines do NOT protect. Unvaxed does NOT equal 'unprotected', it could well mean precisely the opposit.

Expand full comment

“Why do temperature ADJUSTMENTS correlate with CO2? The probability that this happens by chance is shockingly close to zero.”

“It is proof of man-made climate change – created by adjusting the temperature data to fit a premise – that man-made CO2 released into the atmosphere is driving temperature.”

It is a scam. We already knew that from the climate gate emails.

Only an idiot, useful or not, would believe these charlatans.

Expand full comment

This is the only plausible justification I have heard to date about the China lockdown:

“MAKE NO MISTAKE. EACH AND EVERY EXPOSURE TO THE SPIKE PROTEIN SEEDS AMYLOIDIC FIBRILS. AGAIN, IF YOU CANNOT UNDERSTAND CHINA’S EXTREME ZERO COVID POLICY”...

-copied from WMC Research on substack.

(Please note that I have no clue and find CovidMania^3 insane, both here and abroad)

Expand full comment

well said.

Expand full comment

Once again, in-breeding shall out.

And "THEY" present themselves as the solution to the problems "THEY" have largely caused?

Expand full comment

ZERO HUMANS IS THE RULING CLASS GOAL!

There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, EMF radiation, GEOENGINEERING, starvation and economic collapse - THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of 'useless eaters' and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine!

APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW!

MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 AND FREE AGAIN!

NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT! WAKE UP ALREADY!

TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW 'SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS' FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE.

NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM.

STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL!

NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK.

https://wrenchinthegears.com

http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2020/10/14/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset-an-overview/

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com

https://pandemicfacts.info

https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/covid-19-roadmap-12-step-plan-to-create-a-totalitarian-new-world-order-were-on-number-8-headed-towards-number-9/

https://questioningcovid.com

https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/

http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.html

https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/

Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com

Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire

https://www.technocracy.news

Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io

www.nojabforme.info

https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Apr 28, 2022
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Can someone fact check this insanity?...I mean just add it to the long list I guess. You could tell me the world is run by bloodthirsty satanists at this point and I’d....oh oops. https://www.instagram.com/tv/Cc1oEWtDHXN/?igshid=MDJmNzVkMjY= 👹👹👹👹

Expand full comment